Let's break down what's happening in this quantum computing example.
Understanding the Statevector
Measurement
Important Points
Let me know if you want to explore any of these concepts further!
You're right to ask! The amplitudes of the |0> and |1> states are determined by how the quantum state is prepared.
In this example, the amplitudes are explicitly defined in the code:
v = Statevector([(1 + 2.0j) / 3, -2 / 3])
Here's what it means:
Important: The amplitudes in a quantum state don't directly represent the probability of measuring a state. The probability is determined by the square of the magnitude of the amplitude.
How these amplitudes are determined in practice:
Let me know if you have more questions!
You're absolutely right to focus on how preparation methods influence the amplitudes! Let's break down how this works, using the example you provided.
The Code Example
The code you provided is defining a qubit state directly:
v = Statevector([(1 + 2.0j) / 3, -2 / 3])
This explicitly assigns the amplitudes for the |0> and |1> states as (1 + 2.0j) / 3 and -2 / 3, respectively. This is a shortcut, like saying "Let's imagine this qubit is already in this particular state."
Preparation Methods in Real Quantum Computers
In real quantum computers, we don't directly set the amplitudes like this. Instead, we use quantum gates (operations) to manipulate qubits and create specific states. Here's how it works in general:
Key Point: The specific sequence and type of gates used will determine the final amplitudes of the |0> and |1> states.
Example: Creating the State in the Code
Let's see how we could create the state in your code (v = Statevector([(1 + 2.0j) / 3, -2 / 3])
) using gates:
Important Notes:
I hope this explanation helps you understand how preparation methods affect the amplitudes in quantum computing!
You've hit on a really important point about negative amplitudes in quantum mechanics! Here's the breakdown of why it's not as strange as it might seem:
Why the Negative Sign Matters
Think of it like this:
Imagine two waves, one with a positive amplitude and one with a negative amplitude. When they overlap, they cancel each other out. In quantum mechanics, this kind of destructive interference can lead to unexpected outcomes, like the probability of measuring a particular state being reduced to zero.
Let me know if you have any more questions about complex amplitudes or interference!